Jesus for the Non-religious

Jesus for the Non-religious

Recovering the Divine at the Heart of the Human

Book - 2007
Average Rating:
1
Rate this:
The controversial and bestselling bishop and moral activist attempts to wrestle Jesus from the binding ties of religion so he can become the spiritual and moral hero our world needs. Controversial bishop and moral activist John Shelby Spong has been on a lifelong quest to rescue the Church from irrelevance. In JESUS FOR THE NON RELIGIOUS, he takes aim at the core of the Christian faith: the identity of Jesus himself. He first strips back the myths that have surrounded Jesus for centuries from the virgin birth to his resurrection from the dead. Next, Spong explains how these myths arose because Jesus's followers saw everything he did through the lens of the Hebrew scriptures. With these new revelations, we are then able to see the true Jesus: a heroic figure who revealed divinity through his humanness and can still guide us today. Spong breaks Jesus free from the idol religion has created and restores for us a revolutionary and life-giving figure we all need to meet.
Publisher: [San Francisco, Calif.] : 2007
ISBN: 9780732284954
Branch Call Number: ANF 232.9 SPON
Characteristics: xix, 316 p. ; 24 cm

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

q
Quietlake
Jun 01, 2008

Spong's angry tone continues in this somewhat tired treatment of Jesus. In the early part of the book he chooses phrases and words that almost alienated me. If we understand that people build their lives around their beliefs then care must be taken to bring light, rather than just a big stick.

What Spong says about the liturgical influence on the gospel stories, is interesting and well argued, but I wondered why he attributes all the creative story telling to the gospel writers and not to Jesus himself. Is it possible that Jesus himself was living his life according to the suffering servant images he found in his own study of his scriptures? This is just one of many questions I had from readings Spong's presentation.

I think he is more interested in telling his own gospel, than laying out information for people to think about.

I was also particularly disappointed that Spong does not present relevant information from the many new gospels that have emerged in the last few years such as Thomas, Judas, Philip, and Valentinus. These gospels give very different images of Jesus, and by not referring to them I wonder if he is unaware of them. I find this hard to believe, but for example, Elaine H. Pagels' thesis that the gospel of John was written in response to the movement behind the Gospel of Thomas is very enlightening to the discussion.

I was also surprised that Spong does not seem to be aware of the concept of mimesis. In his discussion of the Jewish scapegoat ritual, I was expecting him to show how Jesus put an end to that mimetic mechanism, but he didn't quite complete the picture, causing me to wonder if he is unaware of Rene Girard's work. I serious lack of research if true, a serious oversight if not.

Finally I was surprised that with his relationship to Progressive Christianity, he seems unaware of the theory of Spiral Dynamics, which is very popular in PC circles. I think he would reach very different conclusions if he had been exposed to that framework of understanding human development.

For example, Spong says that the idea of Jesus saving us from our sins is, "totally inappropriate" because it produces guilt and gratitude but not wholeness. He never really does explain what he means by wholeness but goes on at some length about how theism is a response to fear, that religion is a system to relieve anxiety, and essentially pooh poohs this. It becomes clear in the final chapters that he is deeply discontented with his own religion but seems unable to let go of a romantic idea of Jesus.

If, instead of trying to suggest an alternative way of viewing the gospels he were to do a little more research and meditation on the role of religion in human affairs, he might have seen that barbed critiques of orthodox Christianity are unhelpful and only serve to discredit his message. After all, after he has roundly beaten to pieces the idea that the gospels are historic narratives, why then should we consider the message of Jesus at all? In one breath he is dismissing (his word) the literal or historic credibility of the gospels, and then quotes heavily from the same document to support his ideas.

My feeling after finishing this book is that the message of Jesus may be adjusted for the non-religious, but so what? I am much more interested in authentic religion than in a secular version of Jesus. Spong does a good job of showing the "tribalism" that defines much of human affairs, but demonstrates his own boomerism by not offering a full picture of how an individual deals with the anxiety of a loss of faith.

If you found this book as wanting as I did, consider reading the work of Rene Girard and also of Don Beck, and definitely listen to Margaret Visser's 2002 CBC Massey Lecture called Beyond Fate available on Audio Book from the Library. Much more insightful and scholarly.

Age Suitability

Add Age Suitability

There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at LCCL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top